Monday, August 3, 2009

Homosexuality


"The fact that we are even in the same genus makes me ashamed to call myself "homo"" Prof. Farnsworth - Futurama
I hope no one took offense to that; I figured we needed a good joke to lighten everyone up as this will likely prove very unpopular. Popularity, though, does not decide truth, nor do I. Therefore my own views, whatever they may be, must be put away, and God’s Word come first. It has been asked (by numerous people in numerous ways) what is the “Christian view on homosexuality?” Well, aside from simply quoting scripture, which we should do, but would probably make us look like we-dislike-anyone-different-Bible-thumpers, we would like to give a few thoughts (we hope are worthy of your consideration).

Homosexual Lifestyle and Christianity

First, it needs be noted that we do not condemn anyone for homosexuality, so please do not read this as an angry rant against homosexual behavior. However we cannot condone it either. What we can do is love and accept everyone equally, despise and repent from every sin equally. We love you no less, no more than anyone else; we are all in the same boat. All fallen, all sinful.

That said, it is frightfully hard for us humans to work out this thing called sexuality in all its forms of subtle interest and raging libidos. Give an inch, it takes a mile; try to reign it in, it might pull you down like an anchor dropped through the center of a boat. In short, for many of us our sexuality is monstrously and disastrously confusing. For some it is not (however those people are confused as to why others are confused – so, at least in part, it seems we are all a little confused.) God is fair though, fear not; He knows what shackles may bind our conscience and what effects the Fall may have had on our particular make up. I speak not on what “nature” should tell us, for “nature” may mean, either of two things: that which our body parts show to be seemingly simple Tab-A-fits-n-Tab-B (sorry if that is crude, no way to say it euphemistically) as well as that to which our inner emotion, rational, instinctive and attractive desires point us. Our sexuality is never so easy, nor is the position that argues we are either homosexual or heterosexual. That is fallacious bifurcation (because some are (ahem) “bi.”) Humans are a mass of nerves and issues, desires and longings that are confounding for the best of us (but who is judging “best?”)

Therefore, speaking on purely “Christian” terms, there is no more wrong in the homosexual lifestyle than in, say, a fully heterosexual person who fulfills his/her every sexual desire for everyone of the opposite sex. That loose person doesn’t need a member of the opposite sex, simply the body parts the opposite sex is defined by. He doesn’t seek a woman, only the thing that makes her woman. It is to look on another human as mere meat and ignore the divine image in which they are made.

There are many arguments for homosexual partnerships and lifestyles, we are aware, but they all cannot stand for long. For example, one argument says that heterosexual promiscuity is denounced by Jesus because it denies “love” whereas a homosexual couple’s relationship is argued to be founded solely on love and God is love, therefore it cannot be wrong. However that argument denies many (if not all) other qualifications that go into a Judeo/Christian martial union as well as God’s other defining attributes. Love is important, indeed foremost, but to deny fidelity, mercy, justice, honor, purpose and diversification denies His purpose for making us two separate creatures. There are aspects of a relationship that can only be experienced when paired to our biological counterpart, for we are vastly different beings yet the same. Man is made in God’s image; woman is not made in Man’s image, but God’s as well, therefore there are facets of God’s wonder we will never begin to comprehend – important facets – should we create a homosexual joining. And, of course, denying any of God’s attributes is to make a god in our image, not His. We need the opposite sex, no matter what Bono says of women and men, fish and bicycles.

In this series Next | Last

6 comments:

David England said...

Many religious proponents of gay marriage certainly do take the 'love' line, as you say, James - they seem to think that just because God is loving that He approves of anything that is done for or out of love! I'm not sure where they get that idea from in the Scripture... . He certainly draws no distinctions between the adulterers who are in love and those just in lust!

Anonymous said...

To me, adultery is being with (lusting after) another person who is NOT your spouse…whether the person is "in love" or in lust, as David said above. As being a follower of Yeshua, I'm pretty sure that's what God thinks, too. Just because one is "in love" with a person does NOT give them a right to commit adultery (lust) after them. If one views porn, they most likely are NOT "in love" with that person. I don't think there is necessarily anything wrong with being "in love" with another person, but if one continuously dwells on that and then lusts, then it's bad. Obviously, I also think that one can ONLY have sex with their spouse in marriage, otherwise it is sin. When I speak of marriage, I mean what God thinks marriage is: between a husband(man) and wife(woman). Therefore, for a man and man, or a woman and woman, to come together in marriage...is IMPOSSIBLE. So, if a man lies with a man, as a man lies with a woman, or vice-versa, they are lusting after someone who is NOT their spouse. This is SIN. I don't care how people see it; I care how God sees it. He sees it as SIN. God does NOT bring a (wo)man and (wo)man together in marriage, that’s what (wo)mankind does. Sometimes it is God’s will that a person does not get married, even if a man is “in love” with very strong feelings for a woman. If God doesn’t give her to him, and him to her, in marriage, then they should never lie together. That is SIN. Now, looking at homosexuality, if a man is “in love” with strong feelings for another man, it does NOT mean it is God’s will that they lie together…it’s NOT. I’m not saying the feelings of being “in love” are sin, but if the men lie together, as a man lies with a woman, it is SIN. It can be hard to resist these urges/desires/feelings, but God wants us to be obedient to Himself, not to our SELFISH wants. Men and men should love each other as God wants them to. Jonathan and David (in the Bible) truly had love for another. If a man really wants to love another man, as God intends, then those men will NOT lie together. That goes for women, also. One more word on real marriages: Many men and women think sex is a RIGHT, once they are married. It is NOT. They need to love and respect each other in their marriage AND when they have sex. God won’t appreciate their marriage as much if they can’t even love and respect one another, including when having sex. That is all I can think of for now. lol!

Robin said...

Great points guys! It is so true, true indeed, love is what it is all about, but that cannot be taken as an end in and of itself. That makes an idol just as much as if it were Baal we worshiped. God requires respect, justice, faithfulness, charity, affection, friendship, honor all to go with eros, or it is not really love, it is lust. And you are right, Matthew, men can love men, and women, women, but that does not include eros. Each facet of "love" has its purpose, faithfulness to bind and keep truth, etc, and eros, in the very simplest and most basic of terms, reproduction though there are many more purposes to that. However the loss of even just one, as is lost in a homosexual union, or of fidelity in a heterosexual affair (or yes, as Matthew points out, even the absence of respect within a martial relationship) is to make an idol, a god of our own design, and deny the God of all Creation, the Father of our Lord, Jesus.

Again, C.S. Lewis' "The Four Loves" is highly recommended!

Anonymous said...

I've read 4 or 5 C.S. Lewis books, but not "The Four Loves." I would like to read it at some point. Right now, I'm reading the book called "Sane Sex Life."

D said...

The "Love that dares not speak its name" is a love that remains hidden by some and exaulted by others. Those who use religion to condemn and cast aspersion perhaps forget that loving thy neighbor is one of the paramount principles of our Lord and Savior. But what about a man or woman's proclivity--that which is innate, inherent? Some are straight, some are bi, some are gay, some are pan-sexual; and you even have ex-gays and post-gays. To love and to know love and share love and experience love begins with loving God and loving self. What do I know about love? What about desire? I digress...it can confound. But whatever beauty your heart beholds, if it feels good, delicious and right--and you're fortunate that it is mutual, let the choir say: AMEN!

David England said...

D, thanks for chipping in with your views. It's important to note that we are not condemning the individual, just the act. In the same way we condemn adultery, not the adulterer, and drunkenness, not the drunk.

As for those whose proclivity, as you say, is innate, I've addressed this idea in my post entitled “Homosexuality: nature or nurture? Part 1” at our new site (http://www.timordei.org/archives/homosexuality-nature-or-nurture-part-1) and Part 2 (http://www.timordei.org/archives/homosexuality-nature-or-nurture-part-2). Come over to the new site and let us know what you think.

Lastly, the Bible doesn't teach that we should do what "feels good, delicious and right". What it teaches is that we are fallen beings, who have lost our way and need to be shepherded back onto the path. And the path is the one that God sets, not the one we choose ourselves. That's what got us into this mess in the first place!